Which method of surveying provides a legal description based on boundaries and points of beginning?

The Metes and Bounds method of surveying is the correct choice because it is specifically designed to provide a legal description of land based on its boundaries and starting points. This method uses physical features of the landscape, as well as direction and distance, to create a detailed outline of a property.

In Metes and Bounds, the description begins at a specific point, often marked by a physical landmark or a designated marker, and outlines the property by describing the direction and length of each boundary line, incorporating angles and specific distances. This approach is especially useful for irregularly shaped parcels of land.

The other methods lack this specific boundary- and landmark-oriented focus; for example, the Lot and Block system utilizes recorded plats to define parcels within a subdivision rather than natural boundaries. The Rectangular Survey system relies on a grid-like structure based on principal meridians and baselines, which does not align with the detailed and flexible nature of the Metes and Bounds approach. The Surveyor’s Compass might assist in measurements but does not inherently provide a legal description. Thus, Metes and Bounds stands out due to its detailed legal descriptions based on clear boundaries and starting points.